(The Center Square) – Eight years after the completion of the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) and accompanying protests at the ...

Energy Transfer claimed in a lawsuit that Greenpeace was responsible for defamation, disruption and property damage for ...

Greenpeace USA, Greenpeace International and Greenpeace Fund — of colluding to promote acts including trespassing, violence ...

Greenpeace must pay $660 million to Texas-based Energy Transfer Partners and subsidiary Dakota Access LLC for inciting ...

If the verdict stands, Greenpeace will have to pay $667 million in damages to Energy Transfer, which built and owns the ...

A North Dakota jury awarded $667 million in damages to Energy Transfer, the company that runs the Dakota Access Pipeline, ...

1 TRESPASS TO LAND Did Defendants trespass on Energy Transfer's land? 1. Greenpeace Inc. Greenpeace Fund Greenpeace International Х YES NO YES Х NO X YES NO If you answered YES as to any of the ...

Experts called the verdict “beyond punitive.” The organization plans to appeal and has already filed a countersuit in Europe.

James B. Meigs noted that this lawsuit is the 'first major success in exposing and penalizing the putatively legitimate ...

Energy Transfer also alleges that through defamation, Greenpeace pressured nearly half of the pipeline’s investors to withdraw or reduce their support for the project. Greenpeace maintains that ...

On Wednesday, a nine-person jury in North Dakota awarded more than $660 million in damages to Energy Transfer and its ...