Ads for Yiannopoulos’ new book, “Dangerous,” were first accepted by WMATA, then removed from the transit system after riders complained. The lawsuit argues that parts of the agency’s ad policies ...

The Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority is removing billboards posted around Metro stations for a new book by former Breitbart writer Milo Yiannopoulos, citing its rules against political ...

Spitzer characterized the rejection of the ads as a “futile effort by WMATA to try to allow ads on a variety of things, but not ads on which people have different viewpoints. ...

WMATA rejected multiple PETA ads, including one saying "I'm ME, not MEAT. See the Individual. Go Vegan," next to a photo of a pig. The plaintiffs argue that "WMATA has accepted and displayed many ...

In response to Geller’s ad request, WMATA amended its guidelines for commercial advertising to include Guideline 9, an issue-oriented advertising ban that prohibits “advertisements intended to ...

AFDI's Pamela Geller has submitted a "free speech" ad to WMATA that features the winning cartoon from the Garland, Texas, "Draw Muhammad" contest. Accessibility statement Skip to main content.

Liberal and conservative groups sue WMATA over ad policy. by Mike Carter-Conneen/ ABC7. Wed, August 9th 2017 at 1:16 PM. Updated Thu, August 10th 2017 at 9:34 AM. 4. VIEW ALL PHOTOS.

It also sends a clear message to WMATA: While it can place some restrictions on the content of ads, its rules have to be well-defined and narrowly tailored. Start your day with Reason .

The plaintiffs denounced the WMATA’s decision to ban ads with religious content and argued the agency didn’t consistently enforce its policy, noting it had previously authorized ads that ...

WMATA in 2023 rejected the ads — and versions edited to show only the QR code and WallBuilder’s website address — because the posters were “intended to influence members of the public ...

A U.S. District Court has ruled that Metro must now display ads that it had once rejected. The court says the D.C. transit agency violated a nonprofit’s rights to free speech.