The administration has downplayed the importance of the text messages inadvertently sent to The Atlantic’s editor in chief.

CNN’s Jake Tapper offered a short but scathing assessment on Monday amid the White House’s efforts to sweep the war group chat fiasco under the rug. Tapper interviewed The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg,

Screenshots shared by Goldberg show Waltz added the journalist to the Signal chat about an upcoming attack on the Houthi rebels in Yemen, but Waltz has repeatedly said he had neve

The Trump administration tried to paint the Atlantic editor as a liar, so he felt compelled to prove them wrong -- and he had the receipts.

An inadvertent invitation to a group chat thrust The Atlantic's editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg into the center of an explosive national security breach that's put the White House on the defensive. Why it matters: Goldberg's decision to disclose the discussion of planned strikes against Houthi rebels in Yemen and publish the group chat's contents has embroiled top Trump officials in scandal and exposed them to potential legal jeopardy.

The Atlantic published additional text messages from the Signal group chat that its Editor-in-Chief Jeffrey Goldberg was added to accidentally last week.

Atlantic editor Jeffrey Goldberg defended his decision Wednesday to publish the full transcript of messages from a secret government group chat he was added to, as White House officials struggle to downplay the catastrophic leak.

Is Jeffrey Goldberg legally allowed to release the Signal messages he received? - Goldberg published vague information about the attacks in Yemen more than a week after they occurred

National security advisor, Michael Waltz, has reportedly suggested that Jeffrey Goldberg, the editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, hacked his way into the Signal group chat, which detailed plans to bomb the country and Houthi rebels.