A pipeline company’s lawsuit against the environmental group could chill free speech, experts said. First Amendment issues ...
Greenpeace’s 2016 and 2017 protest campaign against Energy Transfer’s Dakota Access Pipeline was one of the group’s most ...
The environmental group had said the lawsuit, over its role in a protest movement, could mean an end to its operations in the ...
13don MSN
Energy Transfer claimed in a lawsuit that Greenpeace was responsible for defamation, disruption and property damage for ...
Experts called the verdict “beyond punitive.” The organization plans to appeal and has already filed a countersuit in Europe.
A North Dakota jury awarded $667 million in damages to Energy Transfer, the company that runs the Dakota Access Pipeline, ...
8don MSNOpinion
If the verdict stands, Greenpeace will have to pay $667 million in damages to Energy Transfer, which built and owns the ...
Greenpeace must pay $660 million to Texas-based Energy Transfer Partners and subsidiary Dakota Access LLC for inciting ...
How SLAPP lawsuits like the one by Energy Transfer against Greenpeace for protesting the Dakota Access Pipeline will impact ...
Energy Transfer Executive Chairman Kelcy Warren claimed in court testimony he traveled to North Dakota in December 2016 to ...
James B. Meigs noted that this lawsuit is the 'first major success in exposing and penalizing the putatively legitimate ...
On Wednesday, a nine-person jury in North Dakota awarded more than $660 million in damages to Energy Transfer and its ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results