Greenpeace’s 2016 and 2017 protest campaign against Energy Transfer’s Dakota Access Pipeline was one of the group’s most ...

A pipeline company’s lawsuit against the environmental group could chill free speech, experts said. First Amendment issues ...

A column by Winona LaDuke, an Ojibwe writer and economist on Minnesota’s White Earth Reservation. She also is co-curator of ...

If the verdict stands, Greenpeace will have to pay $667 million in damages to Energy Transfer, which built and owns the ...

How SLAPP lawsuits like the one by Energy Transfer against Greenpeace for protesting the Dakota Access Pipeline will impact ...

Experts called the verdict “beyond punitive.” The organization plans to appeal and has already filed a countersuit in Europe.

This week, a jury in North Dakota found Greenpeace liable for more than $660 million in damages to Energy Transfer, the company behind the Dakota Access Pipeline. It was a monumental verdict that ...

A North Dakota jury finds the group defamed Energy Transfer LP.

James B. Meigs noted that this lawsuit is the 'first major success in exposing and penalizing the putatively legitimate ...

Energy Transfer Executive Chairman Kelcy Warren claimed in court testimony he traveled to North Dakota in December 2016 to ...

Greenpeace vowed to appeal a North Dakota jury's ruling forcing it to pay $660 million in damages for its protest efforts ...