Ads for Yiannopoulos’ new book, “Dangerous,” were first accepted by WMATA, then removed from the transit system after riders complained. The lawsuit argues that parts of the agency’s ad policies ...

In response to Geller’s ad request, WMATA amended its guidelines for commercial advertising to include Guideline 9, an issue-oriented advertising ban that prohibits “advertisements intended to ...

Spitzer characterized the rejection of the ads as a “futile effort by WMATA to try to allow ads on a variety of things, but not ads on which people have different viewpoints. ...

Maryland is suing on behalf of a WMATA employee who was allegedly fired for raising concerns about lead contamination in ...

The plaintiffs denounced the WMATA’s decision to ban ads with religious content and argued the agency didn’t consistently enforce its policy, noting it had previously authorized ads that ...

'Go to hell Barack' ad must be removed, Moran tells WMATA . Tue, 11 Feb 2025 14:43:34 GMT (1739285014652) Story Infinite Scroll - News3 v1.0.0 (common) ...

It also sends a clear message to WMATA: While it can place some restrictions on the content of ads, its rules have to be well-defined and narrowly tailored. Start your day with Reason .

WMATA in 2023 rejected the ads — and versions edited to show only the QR code and WallBuilder’s website address — because the posters were “intended to influence members of the public ...

WASHINGTON (DC News Now) — The Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) is preparing to roll out its Better Bus Network next month. The Better Bus Network is a total overhaul of ...

Monday marks the first full weekday of service for Metro’s overhauled bus system, dubbed the “Better Bus” Network, following ...

WMATA did not deny that it had refused WMSC's requests, instead its board of directors argued Thursday that the safety commission has been over-reaching in asking the Metro for its health and ...

A U.S. District Court has ruled that Metro must now display ads that it had once rejected. The court says the D.C. transit agency violated a nonprofit’s rights to free speech.