A pipeline company’s lawsuit against the environmental group could chill free speech, experts said. First Amendment issues ...
Court order forcing Greenpeace to pay $660m over pipeline protests will have 'chilling' impact on free speech, campaigners ...
A column by Winona LaDuke, an Ojibwe writer and economist on Minnesota’s White Earth Reservation. She also is co-curator of ...
1 TRESPASS TO LAND Did Defendants trespass on Energy Transfer's land? 1. Greenpeace Inc. Greenpeace Fund Greenpeace International Х YES NO YES Х NO X YES NO If you answered YES as to any of the ...
14don MSN
Energy Transfer claimed in a lawsuit that Greenpeace was responsible for defamation, disruption and property damage for ...
Greenpeace’s 2016 and 2017 protest campaign against Energy Transfer’s Dakota Access Pipeline was one of the group’s most ...
9don MSNOpinion
If the verdict stands, Greenpeace will have to pay $667 million in damages to Energy Transfer, which built and owns the ...
(The Center Square) – Eight years after the completion of the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) and accompanying protests at the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation, the long-awaited trial between Energy ...
Energy Transfer Executive Chairman Kelcy Warren claimed in court testimony he traveled to North Dakota in December 2016 to ...
Greenpeace must pay $660 million to Texas-based Energy Transfer Partners and subsidiary Dakota Access LLC for inciting ...
On Wednesday, a nine-person jury in North Dakota awarded more than $660 million in damages to Energy Transfer and its subsidiary Dakota Access.
12dOpinion
A North Dakota jury finds the group defamed Energy Transfer LP.
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback